Hollar Lock Inspection and
Guarantee Company, Model 1
The earliest Seth Thomas made M-movements were used in a time lock made by a
company owned by Hollar, beginning in 1896, shown here. Based on the Yale
Quad N design, the Hollar time lock included a patented device that could be
electrically triggered to rewind the time lock without opening the door.
This modification involved cutting a round hole in the case back for
Hollar's large ( over 4 1/2 inches in diameter) power spring in a case and
the replacement of the third movement with the electric switch that would be
connected to the outside of the vault door through the connections on the
case top. other specially made parts on the Hollar time lock included thee
third though-glass eyelet for the oversized winding arbor, the angled
snubber bar that could move clear of the electric winding motor, and the
case itself, which was made by Yale and supplied only to Hollar with this
polished bronze finish and machined scalloping.
The third movement space is reserved for the rewinding mechanism. A very
large spring is located behind the movement. Located at the top, and under
the Hollars Patents plate is a solenoid that when energized pulls that plate
toward the solenoids behind it, that plate is connected to a pivoted lever
which engages a fly fan (hidden behind the snubber bar, see patent drawings
below) which is connected to the worm screw. When the solenoid is energized,
the fly is released and the spring rewinds the time lock to the right, not
all of the time locks. To prevent the other two time locks from continuing
to run down, thus putting the lock off guard prematurely, there is also a
locking mechanism to freeze those movements. One can immediately see several
problems that may arise with this system. First, the reserve power to rewind
the time lock movement, and thus extend the period that the lock is on guard
is limited to the duration of the spring. Hollar tried to ameliorate this
issue by supplying a huge spring, with an ability to rewind the the time
lock several times. Next if there is a malfunction with the movement to the
right of the rewind spring, and the other two are frozen you have a lockout.
Of course this rewind option would only be used in the case of an emergency
so one can see the acceptable risk. Third if the mechanism fails to lock out
the two other time lock movements to the left, the delay function is
defeated. Their Model 2
eliminated these issues by substituting the manually wound spring with a
solenoid that wound all of the movements simultaneously, eliminating the
need to lockout any of the movements or having any large spring limiting the
duration of the emergency time extension.
This time lock is devilishly complicated, refer to the patent drawings
below, a bad thing for a time lock that should be designed to operate as
simply and flawlessly as possible, but great for a collector!
The control mechanism for the activation of the emergency rewind mechanism.
See patent drawings below for clarification.
The very large emergency rewind spring barrel is shown here at 4" in
diameter. Next the electrical connections to release the rewind spring for
one movement and stop mechanisms for the other two.
These photos show Yale's Number 1 dual bolt motor, their largest, most
powerful, featuring a secondary reserve spring in case the primary spring
In the 1890's, with the advent of enormous main vault doors to project the
prestige and security of banks, the vaults equipped with automatic bolt
motors to actuate the bolt works and release mechanisms became
proportionally larger, heavier, and more difficult to actuate. The Yale &
Towne Mfg. Co. had for some years relied on its Triple K and L models, but
in 1893 the firm introduced a more elegant solution the Yale Quad N time
The quad N was a four-movement design for automatics, but unlike Sargent &
Greenleaf's Model K (the other four movement for automatics at the time) the
Quad N used an entirely new movement format, the M-sized modular movement.
Originally made for Yale by E. Howard, the seventy-two hour M-movement was a
large-format design, with a broad face and wider, taller plates that allowed
for a longer, more powerful throw-the combined pull of four M-movements
exceeded 70 pounds.
Significantly over engineered with regard to its need for reliability, the
M-movement was intended to be an impressive part of an impressive vault
Due to the thin market for four-movement time locks in general, E. Howard
had made only two hundred of the M-movements before its exit from the time
lock movement business in 1902. After this, all Yale movements including the
M were supplied by Seth Thomas, with M-movement serial numbers beginning at
500. Seth Thomas continued making the M-movement until about 1916 with the
very last of these having a different dial design, including the Yale name
in a circle at the top center. Almost all were seventy-two hour movements,
but a handful of the last M-movements could run for ninety-six hours. The
only known set of ninety-six hour movements in a time lock is in a
Hollar Model 2. When the industry standard
advanced to 120-hour movements after World War I, Yale offered to retro-fit
seventy-two hour M-movements, a procedure that was still being done as late
as 1970. Consequently, the 120 hour M-movements can be found with any serial
number and commonly display a ring of wear around the winding arbor gear
were the older, larger seventy-two hour arbor gear was replaced with the
smaller 120-hour gear.
A later, second type of the Hollar
the Model 2,
moved the rewinding switch gear to an area above the movements behind a
plate, allowing the fourth movement to be reintroduced. This version was
described in a Scientific American article, April 21, 1906, which explained the
value of the value of Hollar's device:
"Should conditions arise, however, which would, in the opinions of the
proper custodians of the vault, justify them in keeping the vault locked for
any additional number of hours, beyond the time for which it was originally
set, this can be accomplished without opening the vault doors, and without
anyone having to access the locks. The value of this feature may be
illustrated when the contingency of fire or or riot is considered, for in
either case it would be undesirable to permit the action of the time lock
mechanism to make possible the unlocking of the vault. Under these
conditions, all that would be necessary would be to simply close a switch,
when the time lock movements would be electrically rewound, thereby
preventing the opening of the doors until the expiration of the added number
Altogether fewer than one hundred Hollar time locks are thought to have been
made, and two of each type are known to survive today. This example was was
recovered following the demolition of an abandoned bank building in Indiana
in 2002. The total production of Quad N time locks by Yale did not exceed
four hundred, with five examples of the Quad N remaining today. (1)
Here one can see the rewind mechanism complete with the fly mounted to the
worm gear. This is acts as a governor to the large, powerful spring to which
it is attached allowing the time lock movement to the right to be rewound in
a controlled manner.
This drawing shows the stop bar that engages the two remaining time lock
movements that are not rewound, preventing them from prematurely putting the
lock off guard in case of an emergency requiring a rewind of the one
movement to the left, as seen from the rear.
This drawing shows the solenoid release for the fly fan controlling the
large spring for the rewinding of one of the time lock movements.
Model 1. 1896. This small company used the earliest 'M'
sized movements supplied by Seth Thomas about the time E. Howard exited the time lock
business in 1902. This company's unique design incorporated an electrical
device (the switch gear located where the third movement would have been
placed as well as electrical contacts on the top of the case) that
could, in case of an emergency, allow the time locks to be rewound without having to open
the vault door. This could be useful in the case of a civil catastrophe such as riot
or fire, an occurrence that Bankers of the 1890's would have been aware of,
having seen recent unrest from such issues as race and labor organization as
well as earlier concerns such as the Civil War draft. Apparently this was not a feature that the market felt justified the extra cost.
Less than 100 Hollar locks were made in two design formats of which only two of each
format are known to survive. Given the many similarities in the case design and the fact
that Hollar's movements were interchangeable with Yale's, and indeed the
Model 1 was equipped with Yale insignia movements, the locks were certainly
supplied by Yale.
There is an example of a M-movement made for Hollar that has a Hollar
designation on the dial. Just as Hollar designed, but did not fabricate safes and vaults, it appears
that this too was the case with its time lock. Later Yale would help out
another new entrant into the time lock market,
Mosler Safe Co.
in 1916. The bolt motor was Yale's Model 1, their largest and most powerful.
This time lock is the same example as illustrated in
American Genius. Case #36, movements #504M, #530M and #532M. Time lock only, 9.5"w x
6.25"h x 4"d. Bolt motor #141 file 282
Lastly are photos of three vault doors with a Yale
Quad N using the Hollar Electric Winding Mechanism, (smaller case mounted
above the Yale time lock).
The first three photos show a round door style that was built by the
Hall Safe and Lock Company. The close up in the third photo shows the
separate electric controller on top of the four movement Yale Quad N. This unit
is what does the remote winding of that time lock. The second installation
is another Hollar design built by L.H. Miller Safe and Iron Works. It appears to have a Yale Quad
style time lock that has been retrofitted with four much later Swiss
movements and using the smaller size 'L' in place of the original, larger
'M' size movements. The third by the Detroit Safe Company
uses Hollar's first time lock design, the Model 1. All use a Yale automatic bolt motor.
What's interesting about all of these examples is the fact that Hollar makes
sure by prominent signage that they are the designers of each of these
vaults. Hollar, unlike many other time lock makers was also involved in safe
and vault design but did not actually fabricate them. Hall, Diebold and Mosler are other examples of time lock
makers who were also not only designers but also builders of safe and
An example of what now is a Yale Quad N fitted with Hollar's emergency
rewinding device. An interesting observation is the fact that the
M-movements have a 120 hour duration
and was a later retrofit of the 96 or 72 hour movements by Yale. Also note
that all the movements are identical. The special rewinding mechanism
located in the third movement plate location has been replaced with a
regular movement and the glass has been replaced with no holes for winding
eyelets. This means the auxiliary Hollar rewinding mechanism located on top
is no longer functional and the lock now operates like a Yale Quad N. The
winder is left in place so as not to disturb the look of the door. A vault
door with missing parts does not instill confidence!
Most complex or otherwise esoteric time locks like the Hollar, Holms and
Consolidated Dual Guard have either been modified or replaced as time went
on and their reliability or serviceability became problematic. In the case
of Hollar it was especially easy to convert the lock to a Yale Quad N by
replacing the third winding mechanism with a regular third movement and the
Hollar snubber bar with the Yale counterpart, so few unaltered examples of
the Hollar survive.
Patent drawings showing the Hollar rewinding system designed for time locks
by other makers as illustrated above. Both patents covering this auxiliary
system as well as the one for their Model 1 were filed August 20, 1895.
These photos show an installation with later updated time locks to 120
hours. The door is currently located in a restaraunt.
These three photos show a Hollar model 1 in what appears to be a Yale case,
note the four winding eyelets, the third one is located where a winding
arbor should be if the movement were like the other three and the larger
winding arbor currently located on the third movement lacks the larger
eyelet as illustrated on the example illustrated at the top of this page.
This lock now operates like a Yale Quad N but less one movement. Note the
six electrical contacts are split into a pair of three to accommodate the
safe door bolt work. Here too, the rewinding feature of the lock has been
disabled as the wiring that connects the Chinnock electromotor within the
lock is missing from connecting to the wiring posts above the lock case.
That wiring is run from the now empty post holes in the front through a set
of holes drilled in the lock's door jam which can just be barely seen in the
foreground of each post. The wiring leading from the lock to the exterior
electrical source and controller is still connected to the rear of each
post. It would be interesting to know if that controller still exists. A
Hollar movement mounting plate would be interchangeable with a Yale Quad N
case. My guess here, is that for installations where Hollar was the safe
designer, they used the gold-tone case and bolt motor to match the rest of
the door. In other installations, like this one within a Diebold door, Yale
provided their standard case, silver finish and bolt motor.
Photos: Ryan Krakowsky.
This photo shows a Hollar vault with a Yale Quad N that has had its original
M-sized movements replaced with a set of smaller modern, Swiss-made Yale
L-movements. The automatic bolt motor has a beautiful bevel glass insert in
place of the solid name plate. This is the only example this author has ever
seen of this style, but an illustration of this type appears in a 1908
catalog. It is interesting that the owners are confident that the weaker,
smaller movements have sufficient power to trip the bolt motor. The entire
rationale for the Quad N was its having the larger, stronger M-movements to
ensure the motor's release. At least this was the marketing rational from
Yale. In reality it took a very small amount of force to trip even their
largest bolt motor and the larger scale time lock and movements were
presented to match that of the door.
These photos show a Hollar Model 1 installed in a Hollar
safe door. Note the beautiful high-relief engraving of the door components
similar to that used to decorate armaments.
(1) American Genius, John & David Erroll, pp. 276-279.